Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law Rated by Super lawyers The Best Lawyers in America TAOS Injury Lawyers
Free Initial Consultation Handset 317.582.0000

Medical Malpractice Newsletter

Structured Settlement May Offer Tax Breaks and Other Benefits

There are numerous legal situations in which a person may receive a large sum of money through a court award or settlement. Often arising as compensation for personal injuries or other acts, most such payouts are reduced due to some or all of the following costs often associated with legal action:

  • Attorneys’ fees and costs advanced
  • Medical and related costs incurred but not paid
  • Medical and related costs paid by the injured party’s own insurance carrier, which must be repaid out of the award (especially if there is a medical lien in place)

Structured Settlements

After all deductions have been made from the award or settlement, the remaining amount may be paid in one lump sum. Injured parties (and their attorneys), however, may also choose a “structured settlement,” i.e., where the settlement is paid out in specified increments over a set period of time.

Structured settlements are often favored by attorneys and insurance companies (who typically actually pay the award or settlement). The reasoning and rationales behind structured settlements include:

  • Protection against the injured party spending the award too quickly (it is estimated that most lump-sum awards are exhausted within five years)
  • When the injuries are catastrophic, the award may be large, and must satisfy the needs for income and medical care in the future
  • Many courts are unwilling to allow parents to manage awards in behalf of minors, for fear that they may spend it
  • A structured settlement may avoid the costs associated with the filing and prosecution of a lawsuit

Procedure for Structured Settlements

A structured settlement may be applied to all or any portion of an award. Although procedures and laws governing such settlements vary from state to state, common elements often include:

  • Negotiations – In order to determine the amount and duration of needed periodic payments, financial planners or other experts are sometimes consulted.
  • Determination of award amount – There must be a determination regarding the available amount for periodic payments. This calculation may include setting aside amounts needed for attorneys’ fees, costs, payment of outstanding medical fees, medical needs in the near future, lump sum needed by the injured party, and possibly other items.
  • Annuity Contract – Parties must select and negotiate an “annuity contract” to fund the periodic payments. Annuity contracts are offered by some insurance companies, and may entail one lump-sum payment for a guaranteed stream of payments for a specified time or even for the life of the recipient. Payments may start immediately or sometime in the future.
  • Drafting of the agreement – Some jurisdictions require court approval for the finalized structured settlement agreement.

Tax Benefit of Structured Settlements

Besides guaranteeing a stream of income for a specified period or for life, there also may be federal tax advantages to a structured settlement. The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) allows an injured taxpayer to exclude from taxable income monies received for physical injuries or sickness, whether from an award in a lawsuit or a negotiated settlement. The Federal Periodic Payment Settlement Act of 1982 amended the IRC, expanding the injured taxpayer’s benefits to allow the exclusion from income of all periodic payments in a structured settlement.

Annuity payments are based upon various factors, including how long the recipient is likely to live. The injured party may live longer and end up receiving substantially more than the original award or settlement, but the excess may also be tax free, providing the injured party never had receipt of the funds used to buy the annuity and has no ownership rights in it.

  • Objects Retained in the Body After Surgery
    As alarming as it may seem, surgical teams have left objects and instruments used during operation inside the body of a patient. Every year, foreign bodies are left in nearly 1,500 patients in surgeries performed in the United... Read more.
  • Res Ipsa Loquitur and Retained Foreign Bodies
    Res ipsa loquitur is a legal doctrine that infers negligence in a situation that lacks direct evidence of wrongdoing. Translated from Latin, res ipsa loquitur means, “the thing speaks for itself.” When res ipsa... Read more.
  • The Difficulties Associated With Establishing Podiatric Medical Negligence
    Generally, a podiatrist is a limited-license practitioner who, depending on the scope of practice recognized by the podiatrist’s home state, can treat medical problems associated with the foot, ankle and/or leg. Depending on their... Read more.
  • "Perfecting" a Medical Lien
    A person injured in an accident caused by the negligence or fault of another may eventually be able to recover damages from the person at fault. However, accident injuries usually require immediate treatment. If the injured party lacks... Read more.
Medical Malpractice News Links
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2014 - 2018 Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
Custom WebExpress™ attorney website design by NextClient.com.