Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law Rated by Super lawyers The Best Lawyers in America TAOS Injury Lawyers
Free Initial Consultation Handset 317.582.0000
August 31 - Newsblog #1
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner and Wife Sue Over Police Shooting
September 7 - Newsblog #2
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner’s Possession of Handgun Legal Under 2nd Amendment
September 14 - Newsblog #3
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: if a Government or Government Agency is at Fault, you can Sue
September 21 - Newsblog #4
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Lawsuit Against Police Department Invokes the Civil Rights Act
September 28 - Newsblog #5
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: A Clear Line from the Action — Or Inaction – To the Injury
October 12 - Newsblog #6
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police Insensitivity Turns Traffic Stop Into a Travesty
October 19 - Newsblog #7
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police who Abuse Power Must be Held Accountable, law Professor States
October 26 - Newsblog #8
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Holding Overly Aggressive Police Accountable
November 2 - Newsblog #9
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Brown vs. Impd Case About Much More Than Punishment or Money
November 9 - Newsblog #10
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Improper Medical Diagnosis and Care Resulted in Loss of an Eye
November 16 - Newsblog #11
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Medical Malpractice Claims Have a Front End and a Back End

Medical Malpractice Newsletter

Protecting Against Refusals to Follow Medical Recommendations

Medical malpractice is largely governed by state law and case law precedent. Thus, generalizations must be checked against the applicable state law standards. One commonality, however, among most jurisdictions, is the notion that a patient may sue a health care provider if there was a lack of “informed consent.” In other words, if a patient undergoes a medical procedure and suffers from an unexpected complication, he should consider filing a civil action based on the theory that the procedure’s potential consequences were not fully explained.

Informed Refusal

On the other hand, when a patient refuses medical recommendations and, as a result, suffers injury, he may sue for negligence based on a lack of “informed refusal.” Although there are many jurisdictional distinctions in this area of the law, patients who seek to bring such an action should, at minimum, be aware of some of the basic elements of a claim based on lack of informed consent.

Patients generally have the right to refuse a physician’s medical recommendations, such as specific treatment or home-care instructions. Sometimes they exercise this right and refuse treatment out of reluctance or fear of the recommended care. Whatever the reason, if a patient refuses treatment and the practitioner fails to directly discuss the possible and probable consequences, the patient’s ability to bring a successful malpractice action is increased.

Determining Whether Informed Refusal Was Effective

Patients who wish to bring an action should determine if the informed refusal was effective. They may do this by recalling if the physician explained and documented the following:

  • The recommended treatment, procedure, test, etc.
  • The reasons for the recommendation
  • The risks that may result from refusal

The patient should have been encouraged to discuss such issues and the reasons for refusal. If a patient indicated that he did not really understand the possible consequences of the refusal, the ramifications of refusing treatment should have been further explained until the patient understood. If a physician does not take the time to address these types of concerns, a patient will have a better chance of being successful in such an action for lack of informed refusal.

It should be noted, however, that even when the elements of informed consent are satisfied (and the practitioner had been thorough and diligent) the physician is not necessarily free from liability. Although it may be a weaker argument, the patient may still assert that he would have acted differently had the practitioner more clearly explained the consequences of refusal.

  • Rate of Hospital-Acquired Infections Concerns CDC
    A nosocomial infection, or hospital-acquired infection, is an infection that was contracted in a hospital. Such infections can be the result of many different factors including poorly sterilized equipment, defective equipment design... Read more.
  • Objects Retained in the Body After Surgery
    As alarming as it may seem, surgical teams have left objects and instruments used during operation inside the body of a patient. Every year, foreign bodies are left in nearly 1,500 patients in surgeries performed in the United... Read more.
  • Dental Malpractice for Severe Nerve Damage
    Dentists and oral surgeons are expected to provide a standard of care that other competent and reasonable dentists and oral surgeons would provide under the same or like circumstances. When they fail to do so, they may be held liable... Read more.
  • Birth Injuries and Medical Malpractice
    Medical malpractice usually involves negligence on the part of a health care professional. As professionals, health care providers, e.g., doctors, surgeons, and nurses, are held to a standard of care for the services they provide. This... Read more.
Medical Malpractice News Links
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2014 - 2018 Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
Custom WebExpress™ attorney website design by NextClient.com.