Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law Rated by Super lawyers The Best Lawyers in America TAOS Injury Lawyers
Free Initial Consultation Handset 317.582.0000
August 31 - Newsblog #1
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner and Wife Sue over Police Shooting
September 7 - Newsblog #2
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner’s Possession of Handgun Legal Under 2nd Amendment
September 14 - Newsblog #3
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: if a Government or Government Agency is at Fault, You Can Sue
September 21 - Newsblog #4
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Lawsuit Against Police Department Invokes the Civil Rights Act
September 28 - Newsblog #5
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: a Clear Line from the Action – or Inaction – to the Injury
October 12 - Newsblog #6
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police Insensitivity Turns Traffic Stop into a Travesty
October 19 - Newsblog #7
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police Who Abuse Power Must Be Held Accountable, Law Professor States
October 26 - Newsblog #8
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Holding Overly Aggressive Police Accountable
November 2 - Newsblog #9
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Brown Vs. Impd Case About Much More Than Punishment or Money
November 9 - Newsblog #10
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Improper Medical Diagnosis and Care Resulted in Loss of an Eye
November 16 - Newsblog #11
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Medical Malpractice Claims Have a Front End and a Back End
November 30 - Newsblog #12
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Truths About Medical Malpractice
December 7 - Newsblog #13
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Yes, You Can Sue City Hall
December 14 - Newsblog #14
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Slip and Fall Changes Two Lives Forever
December 28 - Newsblog #15
In the News: Ramey & Hailey Year in Review
January 4 - Newsblog #16
In the News: Teen’s Sexual Abuse Case Calls Attention to the Problem
January 11 - Newsblog #17
In the News: Parents of Survivor Sue Parents of Shooter
January 18 - Newsblog #18
In the News: Erin Brockovich Teams Up with Indiana Moms

Medical Malpractice Newsletter

Damages Associated With Medical Malpractice Liability

When a doctor or other health care provider engages in conduct (or fails to take action) that results in a patient’s injury or death, the patient and/or family may have a medical malpractice claim. Most cases are based upon a theory of negligence: that the care provided failed to meet required generally accepted standards of care. Although the standard of care varies by state and the medical specialty at issue, it is generally defined as what a reasonably competent health care practitioner would have done under the same or similar circumstances.

Recovery of Damages

Victims of medical malpractice may sue and seek recovery for all damages directly resulting from malpractice, including actual economic losses and “non-economic” damages. The amount awarded for damages usually depends on many different factors, such as the severity of the injury, the degree of negligence involved, pre-existing injuries and past medical history. Often, the award is higher where there is a significant difference in the victim’s quality of life before and after the injury.

Economic Damages

Economic damages may include:

  • Costs of reasonable and necessary medical care
  • Rehabilitative services
  • Loss of earnings
  • Estimated reasonable costs of future medical care and expenses
  • Loss of earning capacity and potential future income

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages are more difficult to assess, but may include:

  • Physical pain and suffering
  • Mental and emotional suffering
  • Physical impairment or disfigurement
  • Inconvenience
  • Loss of enjoyment of life
  • Loss of consortium (disruption of intimate relations with a spouse)

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are intended to punish and deter others from similar conduct, rather than compensate. The burden of proof that must be established prior to receiving such an award varies by state. But generally, there must be clear and convincing evidence that the health care provider acted intentionally or in “reckless disregard” of a known danger to the patient’s safety and welfare. Due to this stringent standard, punitive damage awards are rare in medical malpractice cases.

Damages for a Victim’s Family

Damages may also be awarded to a victim’s family to compensate for the loss of care, companionship, love and affection. Additionally, “wrongful death” damages may be awarded to the family. These types of awards also vary by state and may include:

  • Medical and burial expenses
  • Loss of income that would have supported family members
  • Emotional suffering
  • Loss of the pleasure of the family relationship

Limits on Damage Awards

Many states have laws that limit the amount of damages in malpractice cases (usually for non-economic damages). Many of these laws were prompted by complaints from health care providers and other organizations such as the American Medical Association regarding claimed excessive jury awards and resulting increased premiums for malpractice insurance.

In July 2003, a federal bill, H.R. 4280, that would have limited non-economic damage awards in medical malpractice cases was narrowly defeated in Congress. In May 2004, after being reintroduced, the bill was passed in the House, but was never passed by the Senate. Some of the stated purposes of the bill included the following:

  • Increase the availability of health care services which have become less available where liability actions are shown to have been a cause of the decreased availability
  • Reduce the occurrences of “defensive medicine” and reduce the costs of health insurance
  • Ensure that individuals with “meritorious” health care liability actions are treated equitably
  • Provide standards regarding the availability and limits of damages awards in health care lawsuits in order to improve the “fairness and cost-effectiveness of our current health care liability system.”
  • Increase the sharing of health care information in order to improve patient care

Critics of the bill asserted that increased malpractice insurance rates are a result of bad investments by insurance companies, not awards in actual cases. Even though H.R. 4280 never became law, given the extent of the U.S. health care crisis, it appears likely that similar legislation will continue to be introduced in the future on both federal and state levels.

  • Infants with Cerebral Palsy May Have a Medical Malpractice Claim
    Cerebral Palsy is a birth complication resulting from oxygen deprivation during pregnancy, labor or delivery that affects movement control and muscle condition. Cerebral Palsy occurs in approximately two to four babies out of every... Read more.
  • Amalgam-Related Lawsuits Dismissed
    Amalgams are a type of dental tooth filling which, unlike gold or porcelain fillings, contain mercury. In the past several years, the American Dental Association (ADA) and several state dental chapters have come under the attack of... Read more.
  • Proving Medical Malpractice in Podiatry Cases
    Generally, a podiatrist is a limited-license practitioner who, depending on the scope of practice recognized by the podiatrist’s home state, can treat medical problems associated with the foot, ankle and/or leg. Depending on their... Read more.
  • Informed Consent and Medical Malpractice
    Prior to initiating any medical procedure, a health care provider should obtain the patient’s “informed consent.” What constitutes informed consent varies from state to state, but usually includes a discussion with the... Read more.
Medical Malpractice News Links
Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2014 - 2019 Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
Custom WebExpress™ attorney website design by NextClient.com.