Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law Rated by Super lawyers The Best Lawyers in America TAOS Injury Lawyers
Free Initial Consultation Handset 317.582.0000
August 31 - Newsblog #1
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner and Wife Sue over Police Shooting
September 7 - Newsblog #2
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Homeowner’s Possession of Handgun Legal Under 2nd Amendment
September 14 - Newsblog #3
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: if a Government or Government Agency is at Fault, You Can Sue
September 21 - Newsblog #4
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Lawsuit Against Police Department Invokes the Civil Rights Act
September 28 - Newsblog #5
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: a Clear Line from the Action – or Inaction – to the Injury
October 12 - Newsblog #6
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police Insensitivity Turns Traffic Stop into a Travesty
October 19 - Newsblog #7
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Police Who Abuse Power Must Be Held Accountable, Law Professor States
October 26 - Newsblog #8
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Holding Overly Aggressive Police Accountable
November 2 - Newsblog #9
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Brown Vs. Impd Case About Much More Than Punishment or Money
November 9 - Newsblog #10
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Improper Medical Diagnosis and Care Resulted in Loss of an Eye
November 16 - Newsblog #11
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Medical Malpractice Claims Have a Front End and a Back End
November 30 - Newsblog #12
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Truths About Medical Malpractice
December 7 - Newsblog #13
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Yes, You Can Sue City Hall
December 14 - Newsblog #14
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Slip and Fall Changes Two Lives Forever
December 28 - Newsblog #15
In the News: Ramey & Hailey Year in Review
January 4 - Newsblog #16
In the News: Teen’s Sexual Abuse Case Calls Attention to the Problem
January 11 - Newsblog #17
In the News: Parents of Survivor Sue Parents of Shooter
January 18 - Newsblog #18
In the News: Erin Brockovich Teams Up with Indiana Moms
January 25 - Newsblog #19
Your Injury Attorneys in the News: Case Settled in Favor of Catastrophic Slip and Fall Injury Victim
January 31 - Newsblog #20
In the News: Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Rehab Facility
February 8 - Newsblog #21
In the News: Nurse Arrested in Sexual Abuse Case
February 15 - Newsblog #22
In the News: Running the Clock on Indiana Medical Malpractice
February 22 - Newsblog #23
In the News: to Repeal or Not to Repeal – Indiana Legislators Rule “not”
March 1 - Newsblog #24
In the News: Helping Physicians Keep Helping
March 8 - Newsblog #25
In the News: Parents of Brain-damaged Infant Sue Hospital
March 15 - Newsblog #26
In the News: Owner of Gun Wins Decision
March 22 - Newsblog #27
In the News: Indiana House Passes Long Term Care Protections Bill
April 5 - Newsblog #28
In the News: Slip-and-fall Victim Wins Right to Sue Dollar Tree
April 12 - Newsblog #29
In the News: Inspection Report Shows Vets Harmed at 52 Nursing Homes
April 19 - Newsblog #30
In the News: Sandwich Diversion Causes Fatal Two-semitrailer Crash
April 26 - Newsblog #31
In the News: Does Premises Liability Cover Goose Attacks?
May 10 - Newsblog #32
Two-week-old N.y. Verdict Offers Takeaways for Slip and Fall Victims
May 17 - Newsblog #33
In the News: Barrel Blast Triggers Wrongful Death Lawsuit
May 24 - Newsblog #34
In the News: when a Product Manufacturer is Not at Fault
May 31 - Newsblog #35
In the News – College Doc’s Sexual Abuse of Students Coming to Light
June 7 - Newsblog #36
In the News – One Week, Four Motorcycle Accidents
June 14 - Newsblog #37
List of Troubled Nursing Homes Released


AR15 M4A1 Style Weapon USA Combat Automatic Rifle

The Connecticut Supreme Court has just issued a landmark ruling:  gun manufacturer Remington can be the target of a wrongful death lawsuit because of the way the company marketed the Bushmaster rifle used to kill six educators and 20 students at Sandy Hook Elementary School back in 2012.

Remington had argued that it could not be held liable, because 2005 federal law (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act) shields gun manufacturers from liability when their products are used in crimes, yet, under Connecticut law, Remington can be sued for wrongful marketing.

The plaintiffs in this wrongful death case (one survivor of the attack and relatives of nine of the people killed) argue that the AR-15 rifle used by shooter Adam Lanza is too dangerous for the public.  Remington, the lawsuit claims, glorified the weapon in marketing it to young people.  Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that the Bushmaster and other AR-15 style rifles were designed as military killing machines and should never have been sold to the public at all.

Lawyers for Remington, meanwhile, maintained that the Bushmaster rifle is a legal firearm used by millions for hunting, self-defense and target shooting. Meanwhile, the Remington Corporation’s profitability was so severely hurt by the legal and financial ramifications of the Sandy Hook shooting that it filed for bankruptcy reorganization in 2018.

At Ramey & Hailey Law, we know the question of who can be held liable when gun violence causes injury and death is a complicated one. If you or someone close to you was unintentionally injured by a firearm, there may be financial recourse available from:

  1. the manufacturer of a defective or malfunctioning firearm (under product liability law)
  2. a person who was negligent in storing or handling the gun (under gun liability law)

If the injury was inflicted intentionally, victims or their survivors might recover a settlement from:

  1. a gun seller (who was negligent in following the law about selling to a minor or to someone with a criminal background)
  2. the parents of a minor who were negligent in supervising their child or in keeping guns and ammo out of that child’s hands
  3. the school that failed to put in place adequate safety measures

The wrongful death lawsuit against Remington was allowed to move forward based on a state law concerning unfair trade practices. The theory is that, while Remington did not commit the massacre, the company’s marketing materials inspired it. The principle is called “negligent entrustment”. Remington entrusted to the public a product it should have known could be used to injure others.

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2014 - 2019 Ramey & Hailey, Attorneys at Law. All rights reserved.
Custom WebExpress™ attorney website design by NextClient.com.